Skip to main content

Colne Grafting

As many of you know already, the inspiration for the WTT to seek funding to set up the national Trout in the Town project came from Andy Pritchard's band of folk on the River Colne in East Lancashire. Watch and enjoy the video below, filmed and edited by Colne's Albert Wood. Check out guest appearances of "Sheffield Trout in the Town" luminaries Kath and John Blewitt. The brash that was being collected was destined for pulping following tree works at a plantation at Stocks Reservoir. Just a few simple phonecalls and emails (via Natural England) identified this source of "soft revetment" raw material. A couple more emails to let Andy P know of the opportunity and the next thing you know he's dashed off a risk assessment and arranged a fleet of flatbed tipper vans and trailers along with a band of volunteers to shift the lot 15 miles to Colne. Andy and all the rest of the folk are, I'm sure you'll agree, an inspiration for the amount of sheer hard work they are willing to organise and complete during their "free" time.

The resultant 8 tipper loads of brash will be used to slow down the rate of inappropriate erosion that is currently exposing service pipes and putting too much sediment into the river Colne just upstream of the main town (an example of similar work on the river Manifold can be seen in the photos at the bottom of the page).














When banks are being lost at a rate of around one metre per storm event along miles of riverbank (like here on the river Manifold), terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna are badly impacted



Brashings can be used to slow down runaway erosion and collapse of riverbanks


It is important to highlight that erosion is a vital ecological process - but can run out of control in grazed systems. In such instances, extensive regular bank loss leads to significant reductions in habitat quality for a wide range of aquatic and terrestrial species of flora and fauna. Attempts to stop erosion dead in its tracks using "Hard" revetments of blocks of stone or gabion baskets often create more problems than they solve (due to eddying currents arising from their relatively smooth, geometrically angular surfaces). Fast linear flow and whirling vortices that are both promoted by "hard" engineering result in flashier river flows and higher potential for destructive erosion. Brashings are an ideal alternative due to their very high surface area to volume ratio (hydrologically, they are much "rougher" than hard engineering). This has the effect of "stilling" or damping out fast flowing water currents next to the bank, accumulating sediment, regrading the vertical bank faces to a more shallow incline and (in combination with managed livestock access) allowing marginal vegetation to grow up and consolidate the new bank. The branches also provide habitat in their own right for a range of invertebrate and vertebrate species (including juvenile trout and kingfishers as notable, linked, examples).

Comments

Nick Moody said…
Wahl, that's great, thanks Paul.

I've read down your whole blog to here, so far, and this article taught me something new.

I've already copy and paste - forwarded the ones above about Weir removal and the diagram for stream improvement with an upstream V etc to my father who is restoring his own section of a spawning stream near Christchurch, in South Island, New Zealand.

It's great to see how professional, and further developed urban and small stream restoration is in the UK. As here in NZ we are lagging far behind.

I think that some of my fellow 'Community based stream restoration' fans and practitioners should attend some talks and training with your organisation!

Nick Moody

Queenstown, NZ.

( www.flyfishingtheworld.blogspot.com )

Popular posts from this blog

Catching and Releasing the first Fly-Caught wild trout from a stream that was dug out of a city-centre pipe was probably the highlight of 2016 for me!

Buried in a brick tunnel under England's industrial developments of the 1800s, a section of the Porter Brook in Sheffield was brought back to the surface by a bold project co-ordinated by Sheffield City Council and involving the Wild Trout Trust, The Environment Agency and many more partners.

You can now witness the actual process of freeing the Brook from its pipe - and the creation of functioning trout-stream habitat in this short video.



Yet, the above video does not show the completed park that was a huge part of the entire project - and it does not show the planted vegetation beginning to develop in the summer of 2016. And, it does not show any fly fishing or video of a trout capture...

But the film, below, that was made by the excellent Huckleberry Films as part of the Canal & Rivers Trust "Living Waterways" awar…

Buried Stream Project Wins National Prize

I'm delighted to say that the Porter Brook Deculverting project was selected as the 2016 Winner in the Canal & Rivers Trust for "Contribution to the Built Environment". This was a multi-partner partnership project (with key involvement of Sheffield City Council, the Environment Agency and more) that I was fortunate to have the opportunity to design the in-channel habitat features to provide the best functional benefits for trout and the wider aquatic foodweb. The Sheffield Branch of Trout in the Town "SPRITE" are caring for the habitat as well as monitoring the aquatic life in this new section of daylighted urban stream.

As well as my previous blog posts on the subject, the awards scheme made short videos (less than 2-minutes) long that captured key elements of each project entry. You can see the film for the winning Porter Brook project below. Please enjoy and share (and also check out the other project videos on YouTube from this year's awards).

A previously buried section of stream produces the first fly caught trout in >160 years

As near as I can work out from the archaeology report, this section of river - recently brought back to the surface in dramatic fashion by Sheffield City Council, the EA and the WTT partnership - was buried in a low brick tunnel somewhere around 1853 to 1868. The northern half of the site was certainly buried underground BEFORE the time the 1853 map was produced....and the rest of the brick tunnel was placed over the top of the stream before the map of 1868...

Of course, it is not easy to tell what the water quality was like in that section even BEFORE the stream was buried...and whether there were trout surviving in the stream when it was sealed underground...

What is damned sure is that you couldn't wave a fly fishing rod around in that underground tunnel once they'd built it!

This was still the case until the completion of the massive project to remove the brickwork and create an attractive "pocket park" in the city centre. You might have seen from This Previous …