Skip to main content

Bugs in the Cray

Following on from the water quality data analysis - here is some summarised information that TINTT has pulled together using data kindly supplied by the EA. These data are drawn from sites that are being considered for habitat restoration (with a possible long-term view of restoring native trout populations). First of all, it is apparent that there are examples of a number of invertebrate families that are happily living in the Cray that would not be able to exist in polluted environments. You can particularly see the good populations of Gammarus (freshwater shrimp). These shrimp are a valuable find because they have lifecycles that can take two years or more to complete. In addition, because they can't fly, they are not very good at migrating upstream over weirs to colonise new areas (i.e. they can only really re-colonise from upstream populations if they are wiped out). Taken together - their presence in healthy numbers indicates that water quality tends to be good enough to enable them to complete their long lifecycles. They are also a good "year round" supply of protein for fish.
Another interesting pattern is the obvious cycle of Blue Winged Olive (Ephemerellidae) nymphs as they grow to a size that can be captured by the 2-mm sampling net mesh (and are visible to the naked eye!) towards the summer months - and then after mass hatches in summer - decline to become invisible to the samplers during winter (when they are present as eggs or very small nymphs). The apparent decline of Rhyacophila (a predatory caseless caddis) seems to be replaced by an initial increase in the net spinning Hydropsyche (filter-feeding caddis).
Finally - for two sites that are of particular interest in terms of the potential for nearby habitat restoration - these are averaged "biotic index" scores over several years. The big bars are the mean (average) values and the little legs indicate the variability of the figures around that mean (error bars are one "Standard deviation" - which indicates the spread that would capture about 95% of all the individual values that make up the average). BMWP scores use a ranking system based upon the sensitivity of each family to organic pollution. These scores vary between 1 completely tolerant) and 10 (exceptionally sensitive to organic pollution). The score for each individual family that is present in a sample is summed to give the BMWP. The higher the score - the cleaner the water. The average score of each family (ASPT) gives an indication of how many "sensitive" families are present - the closer this value is to 10 the better (although it is never possible that this is the case - because even the cleanest sites are home to tolerant as well as sensitive bugs). Finally, the Number of Taxa is simply the number of different BMWP families that are present in the sample. Overall - the organisms that are present here do not indicate that there is a serious problem with the water quality in these sections of the Cray. They are fairly typical of a stream that is somewhat impacted by urban effluents (compared to a completely pristine rural chalkstream). However, there is no evidence that the scale of impact on the water quality would prevent the survival of salmonid fish at this stage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

First Survey Record of Wild Trout Returning to Lyme Brook Habitat Works Site!

You may have seen the first three phases of works on the middle reaches of the Lyme Brook (shown in previous blogs Here and Here) from project works that began in 2015...

Well although the first surveys after that work found some nice coarse fish populations - there was no cold hard evidence that any trout had found the newly-improved habitat...Until now!
I received a phone call today from Matt Lawrence who is the EA's Catchment Host for the Trent Valley Catchment Partnership (with key partners Groundwork West Midlands and the Wild Trout Trust who conceived and delivered the habitat works). Matt told me that he'd had some exciting preliminary reports from a EA Midlands fisheries surveys team. Their survey on 7th September had caught several wild trout as part of their sample on the habitat works site.
These are the first modern records of trout in the brook and is also the exciting news that we have been waiting for on these first phases of work to create spawning, juvenile an…
Catching and Releasing the first Fly-Caught wild trout from a stream that was dug out of a city-centre pipe was probably the highlight of 2016 for me!

Buried in a brick tunnel under England's industrial developments of the 1800s, a section of the Porter Brook in Sheffield was brought back to the surface by a bold project co-ordinated by Sheffield City Council and involving the Wild Trout Trust, The Environment Agency and many more partners.

You can now witness the actual process of freeing the Brook from its pipe - and the creation of functioning trout-stream habitat in this short video.



Yet, the above video does not show the completed park that was a huge part of the entire project - and it does not show the planted vegetation beginning to develop in the summer of 2016. And, it does not show any fly fishing or video of a trout capture...

But the film, below, that was made by the excellent Huckleberry Films as part of the Canal & Rivers Trust "Living Waterways" awar…

A previously buried section of stream produces the first fly caught trout in >160 years

As near as I can work out from the archaeology report, this section of river - recently brought back to the surface in dramatic fashion by Sheffield City Council, the EA and the WTT partnership - was buried in a low brick tunnel somewhere around 1853 to 1868. The northern half of the site was certainly buried underground BEFORE the time the 1853 map was produced....and the rest of the brick tunnel was placed over the top of the stream before the map of 1868...

Of course, it is not easy to tell what the water quality was like in that section even BEFORE the stream was buried...and whether there were trout surviving in the stream when it was sealed underground...

What is damned sure is that you couldn't wave a fly fishing rod around in that underground tunnel once they'd built it!

This was still the case until the completion of the massive project to remove the brickwork and create an attractive "pocket park" in the city centre. You might have seen from This Previous …